Joachim, first of all don't worry if 'your' deadline is past. The site structure is key and we will put on it the time needed. Claus said: > > the differences in his proposal that I > > find useful can easily be merged back into the old > > one. Joachim said: > My draft is just that, a draft, and only part of one > at that. I agree with Claus, instead of starting a draft from the ground we can go to the draft structure Claus made months ago and update it to the current scenario and priorities. We can implement the changes on the "old" draft available at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure I have some comments, I will add them to the wiki page. > My scenarios are these: Same as in the structure map, we don't need to start from zero when we have a list of scenarios to be updated at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/UseCases -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part d'un missatge, signada digitalment