Re: www.gnome.org - content, scope, structure
- From: Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com>
- To: Quim Gil <qgil desdeamericaconamor org>
- Cc: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: www.gnome.org - content, scope, structure
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:55:37 +0100 (BST)
--- Quim Gil <qgil desdeamericaconamor org> wrote:
> El dc 02 de 08 del 2006 a les 15:00 +0100, en/na
> Joachim Noreiko va
> > What should wgo provide to a visitor?
> ... or what wgo wants visitors to provide. ;)
> First we need to identify the visitors we want to
> satisfy best. Let's
> concentrate on
> * third party developers
> * public administrations
> * hobbyists
> * GNOME contributors
> (more: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/UseCases )
Ok, that looks like a good list.
> >  http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure
> I have to say I'm getting confused with "Joachim's
> rough draft version
> 1" and the rest of sections. Would it be possible to
> have an
> old-fashioned yet clear tree as in the Former
> proposal for New
> Structure ?
> If I'm understanding what you suggest, I think you
> are going for a wgo
> with too many pages. I think wgo can be more useful
> information and linking wherever you can find more.
I've been away for a few days and the discussion here
seems to have spiralled out of control -- or at least
beyond my ability to follow it.
I can't do mailing lists. They confuse me.
So I have *no idea* what's been decided, and all I
know is that I'm about 5 days behind the target date
for my task.
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" ? The Wall Street Journal
] [Thread Prev