En/na Murray Cumming ha escrit: > We can improve it for 2.14, but now is the time to come up with a > mock-up. I'm still confused about who and where debate and decide about gnome.org website. Take out the wiki, bugzilla, planet, etc. We are talking now about the gnome.org homepage and strcit website, composed by static pages touchable only via CMS, without options to register, without RSS feeds.... I don't see an easy way to decide and apply changes to these pages and keeo them well maintained at a content level if the technology and the process used to this goes throeugh different teams, CVS accounts and hardcoded HTML. Maybe this is goint too much deep, but I think that a vivid gnome.org site should go through a reestructure of the boundaries between the marketing team, the webhackers and the infrastructure people. Actually I would just differenciate content editing (marketing and 50% webhackers) and sysadmin (50% webhackers and infrastructure). Content people don't touch the servers nor need ssh/cvs accounts. sysadmin people don't need to deal with content creation and updates. Both meet in the CMS applications, that have clearly distinct roles for content admins and sysadmins. This is how most middle and big web based organisations work. -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature