It is indeed ancient, from 2002:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libxmlplusplus/files/libxml%2B%2B/0.15/
I doubt that it's even worth thinking about porting the code. It may as
well be an entirely different library. If I were you, I would just see
what the application's code is meant to do now and find out how to do
the same thing with the new libxml++ API.
Murray
--
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 10:26 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> libxml++ 0.15.0 must be really old. The oldest versions I have found
> are 1.0.0 and 2.5.0 from 2003. Does 0.15.0 use the prefix XML instead
> of a namespace? If it does, your first step should probably be to
> replace most XML by xmlpp::.
>
> Kjell
>
> Den 2015-06-16 18:06, Park, Joseph skrev:
>
> > Ladies and Gents...
> >
> >
> > I am faced with the task of upgrading a hydrological simulation
> > model [1] from an early libxml++ (libxml++-0.15.0) to a contemporary
> > one (target libxml++-2.38.1). The code is quite complex and XML
> > parsing is replete.
> >
> >
> > It appears, as one would expect, that over the years libxml++ has
> > fundamentally changed it's class structure, i.e. XMLNode in 0.15.0
> > is no longer defined.
> >
> >
> > So, I'm looking for guidance and suggestions on how to approach such
> > an endeavor, in the hopes that someone has tread this path.
> >
> > [1] http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/xweb%20-%20release%
> > 202/regional%20simulation%20model
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > JP
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > libxmlplusplus-list mailing list
> > libxmlplusplus-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> libxmlplusplus-list mailing list
> libxmlplusplus-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-list
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com