Re: Shouldn't LIBXMLCPP_EXCEPTIONS_ENABLED be defined?

From: Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell ahlstedt bredband net>
To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
Cc: libxmlplusplus-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't LIBXMLCPP_EXCEPTIONS_ENABLED be defined?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:22:50 +0200

2012-04-12 09:51, Murray Cumming skrev:

On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:27 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:

Shouldn't libxml++/configure.ac contain
    AC_DEFINE([LIBXMLCPP_EXCEPTIONS_ENABLED],[1], [This is always set.
This is only for backwards compatibility.])
until the next API break?

Yes, you are right. Please push that change.

Done.http://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml++/commit/?id=950627ed11e2ddf6ced38178ccc17b2cc9752340


Kjell

References:
- Shouldn't LIBXMLCPP_EXCEPTIONS_ENABLED be defined?
  - From: Kjell Ahlstedt
- Re: Shouldn't LIBXMLCPP_EXCEPTIONS_ENABLED be defined?
  - From: Murray Cumming

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]