Re: [libxml++] Glib::ustring, lBoost Lib, and libstdc++

["Trappel Martin" <martin trappel ksengineers at>]

Seems a great idea to me ... I probably could start using libxml++ then :-)

Though that will probably for the boost / glib people to decide?

best regards / mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Martin Trappel
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: libxmlplusplus-general-bounces lists sourceforge net 
> [mailto:libxmlplusplus-general-bounces lists sourceforge net] 
> On Behalf Of Tom Browder
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:45 AM
> To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> Subject: [libxml++] Glib::ustring, lBoost Lib, and libstdc++
> 
> A couple of years ago I participated in a thread here 
> discussing decoupling libxml++'s dependency on the whole of 
> Glib and friends.
> Among other things discussed was possible substitutes for ustring.
> 
> Now I've come back to ask if there has been any thought to 
> proposing that ustring be made a member of the Boost library 
> (for possible future incorporation into the C++ standard library).
> 
> I've looked around a fair amount and it seems to me that 
> ustring is a strong candidate for that honor.  I've searched 
> the archives here and have seen no such discussion, so 
> perhaps there may be interest.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Tom
> 
> Tom Browder
> Niceville, Florida
> USA
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and 
> a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  
> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general
>