Re: [libxml++] CVS: TextReader constructor change

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 17:00 +0000, Nate Nielsen wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I'd prefer just to add another constructor for this if it's really
> > necessary. And size_t is usually unsigned, I believe, so it doesn't seem
> > wise to give -1 a special meaning.
> 
> Hmmm, maybe I'm missing something, but....
> 
> That's exactly what this change did. My original commit (and approved
> patch on bugzilla) erroneously gave a size of -1 a special meaning even
> though it was unsigned.
> 
> This second patch fixed that up and removed the dumb -1 stuff.

Ah, sorry. I guess I would have understand if it had been explained a
bit more in the ChangeLog.

Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com