Re: [libxml++] Re: [xml] libxml version numbers
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Cc: libxml-list <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [libxml++] Re: [xml] libxml version numbers
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 14:19:12 -0400
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:07:21PM +0000, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 13:57 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Every version is deemed stable :-)
>
> API-stable, I mean. I'm sure that not every version is API stable.
Backward compatible, both at the API and ABI level.
> > I will stick to 2.6.X until something big is changed or added.
>
> And 2.6.n+1 will have "small" API additions compare to 2.6.n?
Additions are backward compatible. The think I will not garantee
is forward compat.
> > Then the new branch would be 2.7.X but again I don't
> > know what would trigger such a change. Next API/ABI incompatible release
> > would be 3.0.X but I have no target for this in the short or medium term.
>
> Thanks.
np.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]