Re: [libxml++] Threatening 1.0 again

[Matthew Walton <matthew alledora co uk>]

All sounds good to me, I could really do with a stable API/ABI to 
target. I'm only using the DOM classes, and they're absolutely fine, so 
I'm quite happy with regard to that.

Matthew
A satisfied user (especially when there's a stable version)

Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
> Ok. We wait for SaxParser & Entities to be finished (and included in a 
> release), and then branch :
> - The stable libxml++ will be on a branch tagged 'BRANCH-1_0', and the 
> unstable one in the HEAD.
> - The version of stable libxml++ will be 1.0 (surprising isn't it ?), 
> and the unstable 1.1, as you suggested a long time ago.
> - We may wait a bit after branching before releasing a 1.0 version (with 
> the end of the year as a deadline, which shouldn't be too hard to respect).
>
> Do we agree on that ?