Re: [libxml++] Threatening 1.0 again

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:

> So, when Dan gets his Sax Entities stuff in, I'd like us to think about
> freezing the API again.

Yes.

> Or is there more essential functionality that we
> should think about?
>  

I don't think so. If anybody does, it's time to say it !

> glibmm 2.3.0 is out now, so we could branch and work on the next generation
> unstable libxml++ when we freeze the stable libxml++ API.
>
>  

Ok. We wait for SaxParser & Entities to be finished (and included in a 
release), and then branch :
- The stable libxml++ will be on a branch tagged 'BRANCH-1_0', and the 
unstable one in the HEAD.
- The version of stable libxml++ will be 1.0 (surprising isn't it ?), 
and the unstable 1.1, as you suggested a long time ago.
- We may wait a bit after branching before releasing a 1.0 version (with 
the end of the year as a deadline, which shouldn't be too hard to respect).

Do we agree on that ?


Cheers,

Christophe