Re: [libxml++] SAX2 (was xmlCreatePushParserCtxt() docs wrong (wa s RE: [libxml+ + ] sax_pars er example: entity not defined))

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:

> > Maybe the simplest is to burry the SAX API 
> > and not touch it now that the SAX2 version works reasonably well...
> >    
>
> I think Daniel is talking about this:
> http://www.xmlsoft.org/html/libxml-SAX2.html
> which I think was introduced in libxml 2.6.0. I don't have a clue how to use
> it. Let's not worry about it until the next version of our libxml++ API.
>
>  

The conclusion would be not to handle entities in sax for 1.0 right ?
Looks reasonnable to me.

Cheers,

Christophe