RE: [libxml++] sax_parser example: entity not defined

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> > I would be surprised
> > if we always had to use this dummy document just to get 
> normal entity 
> > substitution.
> 
> It can be made to work without using a Document object, just 
> don't ask me how because this is my preferred solution ;-). I 
> think another solution would end up duplicating much logic in libxml2.

I don't object to your use of the dummy document, I am just surprised that
we must do anything, even when we don't want callbacks for the entities. I
must do some C tests to find out what's going on here.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net