Re: [Re: [libxml++] UTF8 support]
- From: Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [Re: [libxml++] UTF8 support]
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:25:02 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 17:13, Murray Cumming Comneon com a écrit :
> > From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:cow compsoc man ac uk]
> >
> > A simple solution would be for the library to provide all the
> > common instantiations (glib::ustring, QString etc.) and
> > conditionally compile them according to options to configure
> > (--with-ustring, --with-qstring).
>
> Conditional compilation should be avoided. We should expect that libs will
> be distributed in binary form, and only one form of the library will be
> distributed.
>
Can't we do a default behavior (compiling qlibxml++ and glibxml++ for ex) with
warnings if the user compiles it with something different ?
> Also, it confuses the dependency tree - Applications should be able to
> depend on a particular version of a library, without having to worry about
> how that library was built.
>
indeed
Christophe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+eJneB+sU3TyOQjARAtYbAJ4ntufAgwojo6wZy+jpdrwgf9w/NACfd0dy
2WnCZwucIAQjnlkEGJkAfWo=
=1FUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]