Re: [libxml++] Vote: templates everywhere v. Glib::ustring: results + I'm back
- From: Stefan Seefeld <seefeld sympatico ca>
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [libxml++] Vote: templates everywhere v. Glib::ustring: results + I'm back
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:54:58 -0500
Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
But before the definitive choice, I would really like the discussion about an
intermediate solution, with specialized classes for glib::ustring and QString
in a library, and the possibility to use the fully templated classes, to go
to a conclusion.
Never mind my suggestion about using libxml++ with QString. So far I was
the only one suggesting that the two might be used together, and as I
don't use libxml++ anyways, there is really no point for you to work on
a specific libxml++_QString solution.
The question is really (IMO) whether to parametrize or not, not whether
or not to support a specific unicode implementation.
Regards,
Stefan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]