RE: [libxml++] Libxml++ 1.0.0 soon
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: RE: [libxml++] Libxml++ 1.0.0 soon
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:01:10 +0100
> Now it seems we have to deal with the DomParser/Document issue first.
Yes.
> Another thing that was suggested and could be included in 1.0
> since we won't
> support the UTF-8 encoding is to give to constructors, or in
> as a general
> config in the library, which encoding should be put in the
> std::string type,
> instead of copying raw utf-8 systematicaly. libxml should
> have the necessary
> method to do the conversion.
What libxml functions do you mean?
This sounds like a large change that probably doesn't belong in 1.0. People
can do conversions outside of libxml++ if they need to - I suspect that it's
rare.
> Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]