RE: [libxml++] Libxml++ 1.0.0 soon



> Now it seems we have to deal with the DomParser/Document issue first.

Yes.

> Another thing that was suggested and could be included in 1.0 
> since we won't 
> support the UTF-8 encoding is to give to constructors, or in 
> as a general 
> config in the library, which encoding should be put in the 
> std::string type, 
> instead of copying raw utf-8 systematicaly. libxml should 
> have the necessary 
> method to do the conversion.

What libxml functions do you mean?

This sounds like a large change that probably doesn't belong in 1.0. People
can do conversions outside of libxml++ if they need to - I suspect that it's
rare.

> Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]