Re: [libxml++] Adding STL-container-like methods to Node instead of returning container instance (xmlwrapp)
- From: Stefan Seefeld <seefeld sympatico ca>
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [libxml++] Adding STL-container-like methods to Node instead of returning container instance (xmlwrapp)
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:00:29 -0500
Murray Cumming wrote:
I don't think we plan to provide an exactly DOM-specification-compliant
API. I think we are on the right track now. Our hierarchy and API is
DOM-like, but is clearly a C++ API. The list archive might show more
discussion about this.
ok. What are the remaining issues with the iterator proposal ? Could
you please sum up so we can get ahead with this ?
Stefan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
