Re: [libxml++] libxml++ goes 1.0.0

["Ephraim Vider" <eff7 hotmail com>]

I am doing that, but I will not be able to update CVS before Sunday.

Regards,
-eff

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christophe de VIENNE" <cdevienne alphacent com>
To: <libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [libxml++] libxml++ goes 1.0.0


> I think the win32 projects files are not up-to-date.
> Can someone have a look and propose a patch ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Christophe
>
> Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
>
> >Christophe, I have checked in the changes to make libxml++ a 1.0 API. See
> >tha attached patch.
> >
> >I suggest that you post a test tarball somewhere (not on the sourceforge
> >site). I can put it on murrayc.com if you don't have something suitable.
It
> >should be what we plan to release as 1.0.0, but you should rename the
> >tarball to libxml++-1.0.0test1.tar.gz. Then tell the people on the list,
> >then actually release it as libxml++-1.0.0.tar.gz if there are no
> >complaints.
> >
> >Murray Cumming
> >www.murrayc.com
> >murrayc usa net
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general
>