Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Property renamed to Attribute

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Mercredi 20 Novembre 2002 14:54, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 14:49, Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > But if I read well the thread you're refering to, attributes is not the
> > real word either (there is this InfoSet stuff)...
>
> I understood that to mean:
> "properties" is terminology used in the InfoSet, but people don't know
> about InfoSet so it doesn't confuse them to use the wrong terminology in
> libxml.
>

I see.

> > So the question is, do we choose the more 'logical' (attributes), or keep
> > closest to libxml API (properties) ?
> >
> > I personnaly have no real preference, so we can change it to Attributes
> > since you care.
> > We'll have to precise this well in the documentation.
>
> I don't think it will matter much, unless they have used libxml, because
> everyone expects us to use "attributes".

I agree. But at least for the libxml users we can have a small warning/note.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj3bmIUACgkQB+sU3TyOQjBwCgCcCeBLzZO0CoJJ2DDJYYk+eedV
NwgAoNecxzQQsEuEM9Dz92T8y+Y26ILx
=ioTy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----