Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Property renamed to Attribute
- From: Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Property renamed to Attribute
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:49:30 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 20 Novembre 2002 14:31, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 15:30, Christophe de Vienne wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > The Property class has been renamed to Attribute.
> > However, since it's like this in libxml, I kept the 'properties' word
> > instead of attributes.
>
> I just asked on the libxml list. The use of the term "Prop" in the
> libxml API seems to be a mistake that's being kept for compatability.
> Apparently "properties" are something else. Let's fix it in libxml++.
But if I read well the thread you're refering to, attributes is not the real
word either (there is this InfoSet stuff)...
So the question is, do we choose the more 'logical' (attributes), or keep
closest to libxml API (properties) ?
I personnaly have no real preference, so we can change it to Attributes since
you care.
We'll have to precise this well in the documentation.
Cheers,
Christophe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj3bkuoACgkQB+sU3TyOQjBeugCg6HmbrtEfzChj8hi7jxYHGlBK
xNEAoKJ+16ntPLCGecNVdXopOrGH6xC4
=qQGg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]