Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] "std::string &something" versus "std::string& something"

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Vendredi 15 Novembre 2002 15:38, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> I find
> std::string& something
> a lot more readable than
> std::string &something

Mee too :) I personnally prefer
std::string & something

but
std::string& something
would be fine too.
In fact I was about to propose it.

>
> I know it's a personal preference. I'm just hoping that the current
> maintainer agrees and lets me change it. I consider this one of the
> C-isms that were/are in the code, such as (void) and the declaration of
> variables at the top of methods.

I do fully agree. fell free to change it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj3VCMAACgkQB+sU3TyOQjDICQCghzgK4Ez3NSUXSVkb48t0+zYX
oSYAoNCt1n/wRwEeIfzSp3+JYVWu+egb
=E4qc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----