[Libxmlplusplus-general] "std::string &something" versus "std::string& something"

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

I find
std::string& something
a lot more readable than
std::string &something

and I find it much easier to be consistent when dealing with return
values. The former is more common in C++ code.

I know it's a personal preference. I'm just hoping that the current
maintainer agrees and lets me change it. I consider this one of the
C-isms that were/are in the code, such as (void) and the declaration of
variables at the top of methods. 

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com