Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] newbie question: libxml++ vs. xerces-C++

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Mardi 17 Décembre 2002 18:49, darco a écrit :
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 12:17 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>   2) Xerces-C++ seems to use Unicode while libxml doesn't.  Should I
> >>      care?  Or am I missing something?
> >
> > libxml does use Unicode (UTF8) in its API, but libxml++ currently uses
> > std::string, which is not meant for UTF8. In future we will use
> > Glib::ustring from glibmm, currently part of gtkmm:
> > http://www.gtkmm.org/gtkmm2/docs/reference/html/
> > classGlib_1_1ustring.html
>
> Would there be any way to do this without creating a dependency on
> Gtkmm?
>

If I anderstood well what murray told me, not yet. And that's why we don't use 
it in libxml++...

> It would be nice if it could be added to STLPort... But I suppose
> that's a long shot.

*very* long ;-)




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj3/ZH8ACgkQB+sU3TyOQjCjigCcCUQdlJ3mb/lvx+eJ4Gl/4oAm
yqIAn03SGozem1qPFSOfjpQPQcnSX8T+
=wC4M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----