Re: [sigc] Linking dynamically with SigC++ (now rather: License)



On Sunday 15 July 2007, Nicholas Penwarden wrote:
> This clause sounds rather familiar to the "obnoxious BSD advertising
> clause" that everybody seemed to hate so much, no? Strange that they
> would put such a clause in the LGPLv3 after making such a big deal of
> not releasing software under the BSD license because of it.

FYI: i only found out yesterday that the "obnoxious" clause was 
rescinded in 1999:

http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php

ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change


-- 
----- stephan beal
http://s11n.net/home/stephan/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]