Re: [sigc] libsigc++ and g++-4.3

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:38 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> was heard to say:
> > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > >   The typedef in question is protected by a #ifdef and a comment saying
> > > > that it exists only for backwards compatibility.  If I edit the include
> > > > file in /usr/include that declares the corresponding #define and remove
> > > > it, my compile succeeds.
> > > 
> > > I'd be very tempted to remove that in out libsigc++ 2.2 version if it
> > > seems necessary. Hopefully it's only API in a header, and not part of
> > > the shared library.
> > 
> > I think I did that in libsigc++ 2.1.x. Have you tried that?
> 
>   No, I wasn't actually aware of libsigc++ 2.1.  Is there an -announce
> list I should be subscribed to?

I don't particularly want people to use 2.1 yet unless they need to. I'd
really like to know whether it builds for you.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com