Re: [sigc] libsigc++ and g++-4.3

[Daniel Burrows <Daniel_Burrows alumni brown edu>]

On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> was heard to say:
> On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > >   The typedef in question is protected by a #ifdef and a comment saying
> > > that it exists only for backwards compatibility.  If I edit the include
> > > file in /usr/include that declares the corresponding #define and remove
> > > it, my compile succeeds.
> > 
> > I'd be very tempted to remove that in out libsigc++ 2.2 version if it
> > seems necessary. Hopefully it's only API in a header, and not part of
> > the shared library.
> 
> I think I did that in libsigc++ 2.1.x. Have you tried that?

  No, I wasn't actually aware of libsigc++ 2.1.  Is there an -announce
list I should be subscribed to?

  Daniel