Re: [sigc] sigc::trackable::~trackable() is not virtual



On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:06 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> just to be clear, what i said about "this is silly" was focusing on
> the
> size of trackable and derivatives when runtime performance was so
> poor 

Karl Nelson was quite obsessed with runtime performance (though probably
more on signal emission than signal connection, understandably), and
runtime memory use. If you can improve it, for some future
parallel-installable version of libsigc++, and prove that it's an
improvement, you might try to provide a patch.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]