Re: [sigc] LGPL licensing issues regarding C++

[Brett Viren <bv bnl gov>]

Aristid Breitkreuz <aribrei arcor de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I am developing on a C++ library/framework which is currently LGPLed and
> which uses libsigc++ 2.0. I recently read that LGPL is problematic
> regarding C++ and therefore the libstdc++ is licensed GPL+Exception
> instead of LGPL. 

How are LGPLed C++ libs considered problematic?  Can you provide a
link to where you read this?

Maybe this has something to do with LGPLed template headers compiled
in to non-LGPLed main programs?

-Brett.