Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots
- From: Carl Nygard <cjnygard fast net>
- To: Douglas Gregor <dgregor cs indiana edu>
- Cc: libsigc++ list <libsigc-list gnome org>, boost-users lists boost org, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:37:30 -0500
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 17:22 -0500, Carl Nygard wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 08:19 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > On Jan 7, 2005, at 6:12 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > - Regarding libsigc++'s specialization for T_accumulator=nil: We
> > don't need to discuss this in a standards proposal, because it's
> > entirely a quality-of-implementation issue.
> >
>
> Why not? Since it's part of the interface for the Signal (since it's
> one of the template parameters), wouldn't it be subject to the standards
> committee?
Oops, they both define the template parameter, so how they define the
default is an implementation issue? I understand what you meant now.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]