Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

[Carl Nygard <cjnygard fast net>]

On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 17:22 -0500, Carl Nygard wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 08:19 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > On Jan 7, 2005, at 6:12 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> >    - Regarding libsigc++'s specialization for T_accumulator=nil: We 
> > don't need to discuss this in a standards proposal, because it's 
> > entirely a quality-of-implementation issue.
> > 
> 
> Why not?  Since it's part of the interface for the Signal (since it's
> one of the template parameters), wouldn't it be subject to the standards
> committee?

Oops, they both define the template parameter, so how they define the
default is an implementation issue?  I understand what you meant now.