Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots



On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 08:19 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2005, at 6:12 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:

>    - Regarding libsigc++'s specialization for T_accumulator=nil: We 
> don't need to discuss this in a standards proposal, because it's 
> entirely a quality-of-implementation issue.
> 

Why not?  Since it's part of the interface for the Signal (since it's
one of the template parameters), wouldn't it be subject to the standards
committee?


Regards,
Carl




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]