Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Re: gcc 3.4-related gtkmm patches needed ASAP



On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 14:40, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Am 2004.03.18 01:58 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
> > On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 00:16, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > you could try to compile current cvs.
> > 
> > In case you don't see the same thing yourself already:
> > 
> > The build is now broken with regular gcc++ 3.2.2 (RedHat 9)
> 
> Is this still the case? Or was the wrongly chosen __GCC__ macro
> the problem? I did a fresh checkout from cvs and it compiles with
> gcc 3.3.3.

Well, cvs is using my configure-time test now, so it works.

-- 
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc murrayc com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]