Re: Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Re: gcc 3.4-related gtkmm patches needed ASAP

You wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 00:16, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > you could try to compile current cvs.
> In case you don't see the same thing yourself already:
> The build is now broken with regular gcc++ 3.2.2 (RedHat 9)

Weird - with gcc 3.3 it's working!



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]