RE: [sigc] ANNOUNCE: libsigc++ 1.9.11
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: roel riks nl
- Cc: martin-ml hippogriff de, libsigc-list gnome org, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [sigc] ANNOUNCE: libsigc++ 1.9.11
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:15:43 +0100
> From: Roel Vanhout [mailto:roel riks nl]
> Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> >>This is how I would do it; if someone wants it in a different
> >>way, I can change it.
> > It would be nice if it was the same as for libsigc++ 1.2, so that
> > there are no surprises. Also, it's very important that the
> directory
> > name shows exactly what version of MSVC++ the projects are for,
> > because they differ so much.
>
> Ok done. I've made it like it was for the 1.2.5 release, that is: root
> |- MSVC_Net2003
> |- libsigc++_msvcNet2003.sln
> |- libsigc++_msvcNet2003.vcproj
> |- tests
> |- test_accumulated
> |- etc...
>
> My personal opinion is that it would be useful to mark the
> directories
That seems unnecessary as long as the top directory is clearly marked.
> and also the generated .lib file
That seems like a very good idea.
> as being ligsigc 2, eg
> libsigc++2_msvcNet2003.sln
That doesn't seem so bad. It might prevent nested MSVC++ projects from
automatically linking to the wrong thing, as they tend to do.
> etc, but that's just my idea.
>
> There is one difference: in the 1.2.5 releases the test
> directories are
> called bind_return_test and not test_bind_return; I've kept the
> directory names and projects files that same as the .cc file they are
> using. I think this is acceptable.
Of course.
> The updated version can be found on
> www.stack.be/~roel/MSVC_Net2003.zip;
> I've removed the old
> one.
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]