Re: [sigc] How to use sigc::bind<>

[Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de>]

Am 2003.11.11 12:01 schrieb(en) Jeff Franks:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > You are right, it seems to work! I'm surprised that the right 
> > function
> > overload is chosen automatically for bind() without the number! I 
> > hope
> > this is not gcc specific. I will commit this change to cvs. Should we
> > change to zero based argument counting for bind<#>, then? Don't 
> > forget
> > that this might cause even more confusion for people who use 
> > selectors
> > _1, _2, etc. from any lambda library or bind1st(), bind2nd() from 
> > stl.
> > I really don't know what will be more intuitive: 0,1,2... or 1,2,3...
> How about the other adapters like hide<>. I noticed that this change 
> looks like it duplicates the code in the bind.h compatibilty file.

I already committed the changes for hide<>.
The code in the compatibility files is in a different namespace so
we can hardly avoid the code duplication.

Regards,

  Martin