RE: [sigc] How to use sigc::bind<>

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> From: Martin Schulze [mailto:martin-ml hippogriff de] 
> The current syntax is
> "0" for the last argument,
> "1" for the first,
> "2" for the second,
> etc.
> 
> The only alternative to the current syntax I see is to use
> "-1" for the last argument,
> "0" for the first,
> "1" for the second,
> etc.
> 
> I prefer it the way it is currently implemented. IMO, it is 
> very straight-forward. Propositions for a different syntax 
> are welcome.

At the moment, in libsigc++ 1.2, SigC::bind() with no number means "bind the
last argument". That's by far the most common case, and I'm happy as long as
that works. The rest should be documented, but I don't think anybody is
going to use it.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net