On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Andy Fitzsimon <
andyfitz gmail com> wrote:
> Please accept these patches guys.
> Is anyone maintaining libcroco lately? Dodji, Dom?, Owen?
> I know this list at list has been dormant for quite some time....
> Abhishek, if you don't get a response consider yourself the maintainer :-)
> Love and thanks,
> Andy
> On May 26, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Abhishek Sharma <
sharma.abhishek.it@
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I myself am an inkscape developer. Inkscape uses libcroco in its entirety.
> The story is that libcroco has been a very essential part of inskcape and as
> inkscape developers are focusing on standards compliance and code
> cleaning(c++ification!!!) and all, libcroco has also caught their attention
> for some time now. Previously another inskcape developer Bulia, introduced
> certain code fixes and patches to libcroco, but those changes remained in
> inkscape's own version of the codebase. I am including patches for all .c
> and .h which contains fixes(most of which are like including const in the
> code, standard compliance you see ;) ). So my question is, is ti ok to think
> that we can have some or all of these patches merged in the main code base
> stream line?? It shall be really good to introduce them, as most of these
> patches are generic and not specific to inskcape(excluding some). Bulia
> tried to get those patches upstream, but wasn't quite successful, I hope I
> shall be responded back, and we can have certain outcome of a chat :D
>
> Waiting for response.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Abhishek Sharma
>
> <libcrocodiff.tar.gz>
>
> _______________________________________________
> libcroco-list mailing list
>
libcroco-list gnome org
>
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libcroco-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> libcroco-list mailing list
>
libcroco-list gnome org
>
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libcroco-list
>
>