Re: [jokosher-devel] [Usability] Play/Pause or Play and Pause buttons in Jokosher
- From: Laszlo Pandy <laszlok2 gmail com>
- To: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- Cc: Jean-Francois Arseneau <jf arseneau gmail com>, Stuart Langridge <sil kryogenix org>, jokosher-devel-list gnome org, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [jokosher-devel] [Usability] Play/Pause or Play and Pause buttons in Jokosher
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:16:32 -0500
Calum Benson wrote:
The arguments against:
- "Stop" has no real meaning in digital media, "Pause" is sufficient, so
you're only ever going to need Play and Pause functions, which are
effectively opposite states. And it's spatially inefficient to have two
buttons for opposite states, ergo you only need one button.
Well in Jokosher stop kind of has a function. Pause keeps the audio at
the current position (so you can hit play and pick up where you left
off) whereas stop will take you back to the beginning.
Personally, I blame Apple. Until the iPod came along, every CD player
(and of course cassette player) I ever owned had separate Play, Pause
and Stop buttons. But that wouldn't have fitted so nicely onto a
clickwheel, so now everyone's used to overloaded buttons :)
I blame apple too. Banshee seems to copy a lot of things from iTunes,
and that would include their play/pause button, which totem now uses as
well. However Jokosher is different from either banshee, totem or
rhythmbox in the fact that we require a stop button. Currently we use a
play toggle button just like rhythmbox. Is it worth trying to keep
Jokosher's play/pause button consistent with any of these applications
since the stop button is already inconsistent with them all?
Laszlo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]