gvfs gdbus port and the future of HAL
- From: Tomas Bzatek <tbzatek redhat com>
- To: gvfs-list <gvfs-list gnome org>
- Cc: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog debian org>, David Zeuthen <david fubar dk>, Josselin Mouette <joss debian org>
- Subject: gvfs gdbus port and the future of HAL
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:17:09 +0200
Good Friday afternoon,
so I've been working on GDBus port, the code lies in the 'gdbus' branch.
So far only the proxy volume monitor is done and working, making afc,
gdu and gphoto2 volume monitors automatically using the new
infrastructure. Still fixing few leftovers but the code generally works.
I've also made slight changes to the d-bus interface but since it always
been private, it's not a problem.
Bigger problem is HAL, I need your opinion. Here's my proposal:
1. nuke the hal volume monitor - on Linux it's no big deal but other
platforms would suffer (remember the systemd flame on d-d-l and question
about officially supported platforms). Though I guess udisks is probably
going to be available soon on BSDs.
2. remove hal-specific code from gphoto2 volume monitor - gudev takes
priority when available and I suppose it maintains full feature set -
David, could you please confirm? Also in this case, see my concern above
about non-Linux platforms.
Both components are still using libdbus and porting them makes no sense.
Once the volume monitor part is tested/reviewed, I'd like to merge it to
master to get it into 1.10/3.2 release. I'm going to look at porting
core gvfs daemon now.
--
Tomas Bzatek <tbzatek redhat com>
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]