Re: GObject introspection
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- To: Jens Georg <mail jensge org>
- Cc: gupnp-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GObject introspection
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:15:43 +0300
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Jens Georg <mail jensge org> wrote:
> On Mi, 2011-05-11 at 08:18 +0200, Jens Georg wrote:
>
>> >
>> > > Of course this will break ABI and API, so probably not a nice thing to
>> > > do :-/
>> >
>> > Yeah, thats unfortunate. Is it possible to tell GIR to ignore the
>> > virtual functions for now?
>>
>> I tried with (skip) but it was ignored. I'll try to get some infos on
>> #introspection.
>
> Ok, looks like I missed an option. Renaming the vfuncs. Am I right that
> this is internal API or is anyone deriving from DeviceProxy/DeviceInfo
> and reimplementing those? Sven, any comment?
Its not internal but I seriously doubt anyone is deriving from these
classes on the high-level through GIR.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]