Re: GObject introspection

[Jens Georg <mail jensge org>]

On Do, 2011-05-12 at 18:15 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:

> > Ok, looks like I missed an option. Renaming the vfuncs. Am I right that
> > this is internal API or is anyone deriving from DeviceProxy/DeviceInfo
> > and reimplementing those? Sven, any comment?
> 
>   Its not internal but I seriously doubt anyone is deriving from these
> classes on the high-level through GIR.
> 

Ok, apparently one can pass preprocessor flags to g-ir-scanner; what I
did now is which would hide the vfuncs from GIR:

typedef struct {
        GObjectClass parent_class;

        /* vtable */
        xmlNode          * (* get_element) (GUPnPDeviceInfo *info);

        /* FIXME: Once we can break API/ABI, clean-up and rename the
         * _get_device/_get_service functions */
#ifndef GIR_SKIP
        GUPnPDeviceInfo  * (* get_device)  (GUPnPDeviceInfo *info,
                                            xmlNode         *element);
        /*< private >*/
        GUPnPServiceInfo * (* get_service) (GUPnPDeviceInfo *info,
                                            xmlNode         *element);
#endif
        /* future padding */
        void (* _gupnp_reserved1) (void);
        void (* _gupnp_reserved2) (void);
        void (* _gupnp_reserved3) (void);
        void (* _gupnp_reserved4) (void);
} GUPnPDeviceInfoClass;

Which seems to work. Any objections?