Re: [gupnp] [PATCH] Free the array allocated by xmlGetNsList()
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- To: gupnp o-hand com
- Subject: Re: [gupnp] [PATCH] Free the array allocated by xmlGetNsList()
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 00:28:36 +0300
Hi,
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Sven Neumann <s neumann raumfeld com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 15:28 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>
>> > Turns out to be difficult to implement this without changing public API.
>> > We would have to add more parameters to
>> > gupnp_didl_lite_object_new_from_xml().
>>
>> That is not public API so it's not an issue. The only public _new
>> methods are that of DIDLLiteWriter and DIDLLiteParser, all other
>> objects are created by use of methods in these objects which in turn
>> call the (internal) _new methods of object being created.
>
> Ah, I didn't realize that. I tend to mark internal functions that are
> not static with a leading underscore and somehow assumed that this
> convention would be used here as well.
NP. :)
> Will try to come up with a patch
> tomorrow then.
Cool.
> You might want to mark gupnp_didl_lite_object_new_from_xml() with
> G_GNUC_INTERNAL so that it isn't exposed as a public method in the
> library.
Sure, I thought they already are.
>Also gupnp_didl_lite_container_new_from_xml() should probably
> be removed. It doesn't seem to be called from anywhere and isn't even
> prototpyed.
Yikes, that was supposed to be removed along with
gupnp_didl_lite_item_new_from_xml().
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]