Re: [gupnp] Re: commit 7ebd4453f6377ed3c721b3af253cbef423bab0cc
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- To: gupnp o-hand com
- Subject: Re: [gupnp] Re: commit 7ebd4453f6377ed3c721b3af253cbef423bab0cc
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:55:42 +0300
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ross Burton <ross openedhand com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 17:45 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> The commit is quite correct according toe UPnP device architecture
>> doc, the event message is wrong. i-e for each property you have a
>> separate 'property' node, otherwise the parent 'propertyset' would
>> been completely redundant. Where do you get this event from?
>
> Obviously a wireshark log would be useful here.
Why do you need a wireshark log for? It is obvious that either the
message is incorrect or my commit. :)
> We really need a upnp message test suite. :/
Agreed but don't look at me when you say that. :)
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]