Re: [gupnp] Re: commit 7ebd4453f6377ed3c721b3af253cbef423bab0cc



On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 17:45 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>   The commit is quite correct according toe UPnP device architecture
> doc, the event message is wrong. i-e for each property you have a
> separate 'property' node, otherwise the parent 'propertyset' would
> been completely redundant. Where do you get this event from?

Obviously a wireshark log would be useful here.  We really need a upnp
message test suite. :/

Ross
-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]