Re: libgdamm development

[p sun fun gmail com]

Thanks, for clarification. I may play with local modulsets. 



On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 15:36 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> I have not worked with libgdamm, but when looking at some files in
> the GitLab repository, I can see that they are out of date and/or
> inconsistent.
> jhbuild's gnome-world.modules file says that libgdamm's master branch
> depends on gtkmm-3 (and thus indirectly on glibmm-2.4). This does not
> fit with configure.ac, which says         that libgdamm-6.0 depends
> on glibmm-2.56. That's an obsolete name of the new ABI, which is now
> called glibmm-2.58, and which is compatible with gtkmm-4.
> It looks like the libgdamm-5-0 branch is the one to use in
> combination with glibmm-2.4 and gtkmm-3.
> I suppose that if you want to work with the libgdamm's master branch,
> you have to use the latest versions, i.e. the master branches, also
> from gtkmm and the modules it depends on. But that's not what
> 'jhbuild build libgdamm' will give you.
> /Kjell
> On 2018-09-11 05:38, Pavlo Solntsev via gtkmm-list wrote:
> > Hi, 
> > I am trying to compile libgdamm using jhbuild. Everything was
> > compiled
> > successfully but not libgdamm.  It looks like it needs very "fresh"
> > version of glibmm: 
> >
> > return Glib::make_refptr_for_instance<Gnome::Gda::Batch>(
> > dynamic_cast<Gnome::Gda::Batch*> (Glib::wrap_auto
> > ((GObject*)(object),
> > take_copy)) );
> >
> > Could you please share your experience with libgdamm compilation? I
> > was
> > thinking to port some new work in libgda but it is really
> > frustrating
> > if I can't even compile it. Is it really necessary to pull recent
> > glimmand gtkmm-4? 
> >
> > Thanks.
>