Re: C++14

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

Actually, I don't see a real need for it, so I don't have a good reason
to require C++14 (instead of C++11) just yet.

Murray

On Mo, 2016-08-01 at 21:04 +0000, Christoph Brill wrote:
> Hi Murray,
>
> I'm all for latest C++ changes. g++ supports it, clang supports it.
> That's all compilers relevant to me.
>
> Best wishes,
>  Christoph
>
> Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> schrieb am Do., 7. Juli 2016 um
> 12:19 Uhr:
> > Our current stable versions require C++11. Does anybody object to
> > us
> > requiring C++14 for the current unstable versions, which will
> > become
> > the next stable versions? GCC 6 uses C++14 by default.
> >
> > We don't need C++14 for anything urgently but it would be nice to
> > have
> > some little things such as decltype(auto) and std::make_unique().
> >
> > --
> > Murray Cumming
> > murrayc murrayc com
> > www.murrayc.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > gtkmm-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com