Re: C++11 features, move semantics?

[Andrew Potter <agpotter gmail com>]

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Hubert Figuière <hub figuiere net> wrote:
> On 31/07/15 03:16 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Does anyone see any need for this in gtkmm?
> >
> > In theory, I guess we could make Gtk::Widget movable but not copyable,
> > so we could do things like this sometimes:
>
>
> I believe making Gtk::Widget movable (but not copyable) has a benefit
> and could be implemented without too much confusion if we are able to
> deal with "moved" Gtk::Widget properly - ie let the programmer know of
> the error (like when attenmpting to perform something with a Gtk::Widget
> no longer valid since we move it).

I'd also like to see a movable Widget. It's not something I'd need
every day, but
it is really nice to have the flexibility to do a little more
unorthodox things when you
need to.