Re: Replacing Gtk::Action and Gtk::UIManager with Gio::Action and Gtk::Builder
- From: Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk pl gmail com>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Replacing Gtk::Action and Gtk::UIManager with Gio::Action and Gtk::Builder
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:45:49 +0200
2013/9/26 Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>:
because we cannot yet break the ABI to add Gtk::Actionable as a base
class for several classes:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/commit/?id=3381c0aea10891a2dccc49b5e450fd497a3cb807
FWIW:
From my perspective, it would be far more desirable to have complete
and high quality C++ bindings which break the ABI more often than
GTK+, rather than to have incomplete bindings which keep the ABI.
Regards, Krzysztof
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]