Re: Replacing Gtk::Action and Gtk::UIManager with Gio::Action and Gtk::Builder

2013/9/26 Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>:
because we cannot yet break the ABI to add Gtk::Actionable as a base
class for several classes:

From my perspective, it would be far more desirable to have complete
and high quality C++ bindings which break the ABI more often than
GTK+, rather than to have incomplete bindings which keep the ABI.

Regards, Krzysztof

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]