2013-11-24 18:44, John Emmas skrev:
On 23/11/2013 10:23, John Emmas
wrote:
It would be very interesting if you could apply those patches
and see if they change the calling order for you (like they
did for me).
Hi Kjell, I've just had a new idea (a variation on the above
theme).
When you can find some time, could you apply those two relevant
patches to your copy of 2.24 (which I believe is currently
unpatched)? Then rebuild and send me your copies of the following
four files:-
gtk/gtkmm/object.cc
gtk/gtkmm/window.cc
gtk/gtkmm/widget.cc
gtk/gtkmm/widget.h
I can then substitute them in my own gtkmm build. Obviously if
your versions produce any difference in operation, I can then
compare them with my local copies and try to figure out what's
going on. That might be the quickest route to understanding
what's different.
John
I'll send you an email with those files and output from gdb. I don't
think it will interest anyone to have have it on the gtkmm-list.
Of course the order of function calls changes with the patches
applied. That's the aim of the first patch in bug 605728: Break the
link between a GObject and its C++ wrapper as late as possible when
the wrapper is being deleted.
Kjell
|
