RE: Question concerning changes in Gtk::Adjustment from gtkmm-2.4 vs. gtkmm-3.0

["Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063)" <james c tilton nasa gov>]

No - it’s the solution.

The problem I'm trying to solve is to make my gtkmm-2.4 code as similar as possible to my gtkmm-3.0 code for the sake of ease of parallel maintenance of the two version. This strategy solves that problem.

-----Original Message-----
From: Murray Cumming [mailto:murrayc murrayc com] 
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 4:48 PM
To: Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063)
Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
Subject: RE: Question concerning changes in Gtk::Adjustment from gtkmm-2.4 vs. gtkmm-3.0

On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 13:51 -0600, Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063) wrote:
> As it turns out, the call to *.get_hadjustment() (or
> *.get_vadjustment()) in gtkmm-2.4 returns Adjustment* as needed in
> that case, and the same call in gtkmm-3.0 returns
> Glib::RefPtr<Gtk::Adjustment> as needed in that case.

Isn't that the problem you are trying to solve rather than the solution?

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com