RE: Question concerning changes in Gtk::Adjustment from gtkmm-2.4 vs. gtkmm-3.0



On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 13:51 -0600, Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063) wrote:
> As it turns out, the call to *.get_hadjustment() (or
> *.get_vadjustment()) in gtkmm-2.4 returns Adjustment* as needed in
> that case, and the same call in gtkmm-3.0 returns
> Glib::RefPtr<Gtk::Adjustment> as needed in that case.

Isn't that the problem you are trying to solve rather than the solution?

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]