Re: Wrapping Clutter functions.

From: Jens Georg <mail jensge org>
To: Ian Martin <ian_martin65 yahoo com au>
Cc: "gtkmm-list gnome org" <gtkmm-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Wrapping Clutter functions.
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:05:15 +0200

On So, 2011-09-04 at 04:32 -0700, Ian Martin wrote:

> The return value is a pointer to the object itself.  In C I believe
> this helps chain the function; I'm struggling to see why I'd bother in
> C++.  So can I change it to return void (or mabe bool?) or is that
> messing with the library too much?

Why wouldn't it be nice to have the possibility of saying
animator.set_key().set_key().set_key()... ?

Looks quite C++.

References:
- Wrapping Clutter functions.
  - From: Ian Martin

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]